Skip to Main Content
The Firm

Understanding Nevada’s Modified Comparative Negligence Rule

Led by Preston Rezaee, Esq., The Firm is a premier personal injury law practice in Las Vegas, dedicated to delivering justice for accident victims. With a reputation for relentless advocacy and client-focused representation, The Firm ensures injured individuals receive the compensation they deserve.

Many accident victims hesitate to pursue a personal injury claim because they believe they were “partly at fault.” In Nevada, being partially responsible for an accident does not automatically prevent recovery. Instead, Nevada follows a modified comparative negligence rule, which allows injured individuals to recover damages as long as they are not primarily responsible.

Understanding how this rule works is critical, as insurance companies frequently exploit confusion around fault to reduce or deny claims.

What Is Modified Comparative Negligence?

Nevada follows the 50% rule, meaning:

  • You can recover damages if you are 50% or less at fault
  • You cannot recover if you are 51% or more at fault

If you are partially responsible, your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault.

Example:
If you are awarded $100,000 but found 20% at fault, your recovery is reduced to $80,000.

Common Situations Where Fault Is Disputed

  • Rear-end collisions
  • Intersection accidents
  • Slip-and-fall incidents
  • Pedestrian accidents
  • Multi-vehicle crashes
  • Casino or hotel injury claims

Insurance companies often exaggerate a victim’s fault to minimize payouts.

How Insurance Companies Use Comparative Negligence Against You

Adjusters may argue:

  • You were speeding
  • You weren’t paying attention
  • You wore improper footwear
  • You ignored warning signs
  • You failed to react properly

Even minor allegations can significantly reduce compensation if left unchallenged.

Evidence Used to Determine Fault

  • Police reports
  • Surveillance footage
  • Witness statements
  • Accident reconstruction
  • Medical records
  • Vehicle damage analysis

The Firm aggressively collects and preserves evidence to counter unfair fault assignments.

Why Legal Representation Matters

Without an attorney, victims may unknowingly:

  • Admit fault during recorded statements
  • Accept unfair settlement reductions
  • Fail to challenge inaccurate reports

Preston Rezaee, Esq., ensures fault percentages are supported by evidence—not speculation.

Comparative Negligence in Slip-and-Fall Cases

Property owners often argue:

  • The hazard was “open and obvious”
  • The victim wasn’t watching where they walked
  • Warning signs were present
  • Nevada law still requires property owners to maintain safe premises.

How The Firm Protects Clients

The Firm:

  • Challenges exaggerated fault claims
  • Uses expert testimony
  • Negotiates aggressively with insurers
  • Takes cases to trial when necessary

Fault allocation can determine whether compensation is possible at all.

Conclusion

Nevada’s modified comparative negligence rule allows injured victims to recover damages—even when partially at fault. Insurance companies rely on confusion around this law to avoid paying fair compensation. With experienced legal representation, victims can protect their rights and secure the recovery they deserve.

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and is
not intended to constitute legal advice. The content is based on the author’s
understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing and is not tailored to the
specific circumstances of any individual or entity.


Nothing in this article should be construed as creating an attorney-client relationship or
as a substitute for seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney. Legal matters can be
complex and vary greatly depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the case.
Therefore, we strongly encourage readers to consult with qualified legal counsel for
advice regarding their individual circumstances.


The author and publisher of this article assume no responsibility for any errors or
omissions in the content or for any actions taken based on the information provided
herein. The reader assumes full responsibility for any use or reliance on the information
contained in this article.


By using this article, the reader agrees that they will not hold the author or publisher
liable for any outcomes resulting from their use of the information presented.

For specific legal advice, readers are urged to contact a licensed attorney in their
jurisdiction.